Skip to content
MMJ Gazette
  Monday 4 August 2025
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Authors
  • Home
  • News
  • CBD
  • Cannabis
  • Drugs
  • Marijuana
  • Tobacco
  • Law
Trending
August 3, 2025Cannabis Dispensaries Rethink Retail: Design That Sells, Not Just Serves August 2, 2025Legal Weed’s Tax Nightmare: How Cannabis Firms Are Pushing Back Against 280E August 2, 2025Kentucky Gears Up for First Legal Medical Marijuana Sales by Autumn July 31, 2025Hemp THC Ban Pulled from Senate Bill After McConnell–Paul Face-Off July 30, 2025Oklahoma’s Marijuana Legalisation Fight Is Back—And It’s Getting Personal July 30, 2025Starting a Cannabis Business? Here’s What You Really Need to Know First July 29, 2025New York’s Legal Weed Market Nears $1.5 Billion, But How Many Shops Can It Really Handle? July 29, 2025Texas Lawmaker Pushes Cannabis Legalisation Bill During Heated Hemp Debate July 28, 2025Cannabis Shops Are Getting a Makeover – and Sales Are Going Up July 26, 2025State Attorneys General Push Congress to Fix Outdated Marijuana Banking Laws
MMJ Gazette
MMJ Gazette
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Authors
MMJ Gazette
  Marijuana  Government Watchdog Sues Federal Health Agency Over Delayed Marijuana Rescheduling Records
MarijuanaNews

Government Watchdog Sues Federal Health Agency Over Delayed Marijuana Rescheduling Records

Lars BeckersLars Beckers—January 29, 20250
FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedInTumblrRedditVKWhatsAppEmail

A government transparency group has taken legal action against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), accusing the agency of withholding critical records related to the Biden administration’s marijuana rescheduling effort. The lawsuit, filed by Protect the Public’s Trust (PPT), claims HHS has failed to comply with federal transparency laws, leaving the public in the dark about key discussions between top agencies.

Watchdog Group Alleges Federal Violations

Protect the Public’s Trust filed the lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, arguing that HHS has not followed Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requirements. The lawsuit stems from two separate records requests submitted in late 2023, both of which, the group claims, were ignored beyond legally allowed deadlines.

The first request sought internal communications between HHS employees, the Department of Justice, and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) regarding President Biden’s proposal to shift marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III under the Controlled Substances Act. The second request targeted communications within the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) Office of Communications and its discussions with HHS and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) about cannabis rescheduling.

PPT argues that releasing these records is crucial for public understanding of HHS’s role in the process. “Over 418 days have passed, and HHS has yet to issue a determination on these requests,” the lawsuit states.

Did HHS Go Silent?

The group alleges that HHS initially acknowledged the requests but then “went silent.” The agency cited “unusual circumstances” that complicated the processing of the documents. However, no further updates were provided.

Here’s what PPT says HHS has failed to do:

  • Provide the requested records or indicate if they will be released
  • Explain why any information might be withheld
  • Inform PPT of its right to appeal any decision

Now, the organization wants a court to intervene, demanding that HHS turn over the requested records within 10 days of a judge’s order—or in whatever timeframe the court finds appropriate.

What’s in the Missing Records?

It’s unclear what the requested documents might reveal. However, HHS played a central role in the Biden administration’s cannabis review, which ultimately recommended moving marijuana to Schedule III. That recommendation was sent to DEA, which is now responsible for making the final decision.

Some speculate that the internal discussions could shed light on potential disagreements between federal agencies. Notably, Attorney General Merrick Garland—not the DEA’s administrator—signed off on the proposed rule, raising questions about whether DEA leadership resisted the change.

Legal challenges have already delayed DEA’s administrative hearings on the rescheduling issue, adding to the uncertainty. The missing records might provide insights into the internal dynamics influencing the process.

Delays, Political Uncertainty, and a Leadership Vacuum

The marijuana rescheduling process faces even more hurdles, as the Biden administration deals with leadership gaps at DEA. President Trump, since returning to office, has not yet nominated a permanent administrator for the agency. Meanwhile, acting DEA head Derek Maltz has voiced opposition to rescheduling, fueling skepticism about whether the agency will support the proposal.

Trump previously supported the idea of moving cannabis to a lower schedule but has remained silent since taking office again. The administration’s first choice for DEA chief, Sheriff Chad Chronister, withdrew his nomination last month due to conservative backlash over his stance on marijuana decriminalization. Now, another potential nominee, Jack Riley, is under consideration—despite previously calling marijuana a “gateway drug.”

At the same time, Trump’s pick for Attorney General, Pam Bondi, has dodged questions about how she would handle cannabis policy if confirmed. That leaves the future of federal marijuana policy as uncertain as ever.

Public Distrust in DEA’s Role

Despite the government’s reassurances, the public remains skeptical about how the DEA will handle the rescheduling process. A recent poll found that 96% of cannabis consumers don’t trust the agency to oversee marijuana policy fairly. With the legal battle over transparency heating up, this case could force more details about the administration’s approach into the public eye.

FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedInTumblrRedditVKWhatsAppEmail

Lars Beckers

Lars Beckers is a distinguished senior content writer at MMJ Gazette, bringing a wealth of experience and expertise to the realm of medical marijuana and cannabis-related content. With a deep understanding of the industry and a passion for sharing knowledge, Lars's articles offer readers comprehensive insights and engaging narratives in the dynamic world of cannabis. Known for his meticulous research, clarity of expression, and commitment to delivering high-quality content, Lars brings a seasoned perspective to his work, educating and informing audiences on the latest trends and developments in the field.

Hawaii Lawmakers Push Bold Marijuana Legalization Bill, Aiming for 2025 Passage
Virginia Moves Closer to Legal Marijuana Sales as Key Votes Clear Committees
Related posts
  • Related posts
  • More from author
Cannabis

Cannabis Dispensaries Rethink Retail: Design That Sells, Not Just Serves

August 3, 20250
Marijuana

Legal Weed’s Tax Nightmare: How Cannabis Firms Are Pushing Back Against 280E

August 2, 20250
Marijuana

Kentucky Gears Up for First Legal Medical Marijuana Sales by Autumn

August 2, 20250
Load more
Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SEARCH
PROMOTIONS
RECENT POSTS
  • Cannabis Dispensaries Rethink Retail: Design That Sells, Not Just Serves
  • Legal Weed’s Tax Nightmare: How Cannabis Firms Are Pushing Back Against 280E
  • Kentucky Gears Up for First Legal Medical Marijuana Sales by Autumn
  • Hemp THC Ban Pulled from Senate Bill After McConnell–Paul Face-Off
  • Oklahoma’s Marijuana Legalisation Fight Is Back—And It’s Getting Personal
  • Starting a Cannabis Business? Here’s What You Really Need to Know First
  • New York’s Legal Weed Market Nears $1.5 Billion, But How Many Shops Can It Really Handle?
  • Texas Lawmaker Pushes Cannabis Legalisation Bill During Heated Hemp Debate
  • Cannabis Shops Are Getting a Makeover – and Sales Are Going Up
  • State Attorneys General Push Congress to Fix Outdated Marijuana Banking Laws
    © MMJ Gazette. 2024
    • About
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Authors