Skip to content
MMJ Gazette
  Friday 8 May 2026
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Authors
  • Home
  • News
  • CBD
  • Cannabis
  • Drugs
  • Marijuana
  • Tobacco
  • Law
Trending
May 8, 2026FBI Raids Virginia Sen. Lucas Hemp Business May 6, 2026280E Tax Relief: How Far Back for Cannabis? May 1, 2026Missouri Cannabis Cartel Sued Over License Grab April 30, 2026Indiana’s $1.8B Illegal Weed Spend Sparks Legal Fight April 29, 2026Florida Hits Trulieve Over Cannabis Farm Pollution April 28, 2026Oklahoma Cannabis Farm Beats State License Ban April 25, 2026Trump Rescheduling Delivers Narrow Cannabis Tax Win April 24, 2026Marijuana Rescheduling Reshapes Cannabis Companies April 23, 2026Ari Raptis Masters Cannabis Logistics Boom April 22, 2026Predatory Investors Hijack Delaware Cannabis Equity Program
MMJ Gazette
MMJ Gazette
  • About
  • Contact Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Authors
MMJ Gazette
  Cannabis  Cannabis Operators Navigate Licensing Models to Expand Markets
CannabisNews

Cannabis Operators Navigate Licensing Models to Expand Markets

Lars BeckersLars Beckers—December 20, 20240
FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedInTumblrRedditVKWhatsAppEmail

As cannabis legalization spreads across the U.S., companies in the industry are finding creative ways to grow their presence. Licensing, revenue-sharing, and franchising are emerging as key strategies for brands seeking to operate in multiple states while avoiding restrictions on interstate commerce.

The Licensing Landscape: A Complex Puzzle

Cannabis licensing deals allow brands to lend their name, products, or intellectual property to other companies for a fee. These arrangements typically include upfront payments and royalties, with the licensee assuming most of the financial risk. While this model provides a straightforward path to market expansion, it comes with challenges.

Avis Bulbulyan, CEO of California-based Siva, a cannabis consulting firm, emphasized the adaptability of licensing agreements.

“There are 50 different ways to split the fees,” Bulbulyan said, underscoring the variability in how deals are structured. However, some companies are moving beyond the rigid confines of traditional licensing.

Revenue-Sharing: A Collaborative Approach

California-based brand Stone Road has shifted from licensing to a revenue-sharing model, which distributes both revenue and losses equally among partners. This approach ensures that financial risks are shared, fostering a more cooperative relationship.

“It puts everybody in a more collaborative position,” said Sabrina Wheeler, Stone Road’s COO. By aligning the incentives of both parties, this model motivates everyone involved to maximize success.

To thrive in specific markets, Stone Road tailors its product offerings. For instance:

  • California, Massachusetts, and New Mexico: A new pre-rolls multipack tin was introduced.
  • New Mexico: Recognizing a gap, Stone Road launched 1-gram and 2-gram concentrates.

This adaptability has allowed the brand to meet market needs while fostering stronger partnerships.

Picking the Right Partners

Finding reliable partners is crucial for cannabis brands venturing into new markets. Stone Road vets up to 20 potential collaborators before making a decision, a process that prioritizes alignment on values and goals.

“Some think there’s more value to creating an in-house brand,” Wheeler said, explaining why not all prospects are a match.

Profit-sharing, another alternative, focuses on dividing profits rather than revenue. This model requires a high degree of transparency, as partners must share detailed financial information. While profit-sharing can deepen partnerships, Bulbulyan noted that it introduces complexities in accounting and logistics.

The Simplicity of Traditional Licensing

For some companies, traditional licensing remains the preferred option. Old Pal, a California-based flower and edibles brand, relies on licensing to scale its operations while maintaining a lean structure.

“Functionally, we like to keep things simple,” said Old Pal CEO Rusty Wilenkin.

Although profit-sharing offers potential benefits, Wilenkin expressed concerns about its scalability. “It might work in two or three markets, but to scale that nationally would be an overwhelming task to manage,” he said. Instead, Old Pal partners receive a set percentage of sales, making the model predictable and easy to manage with a small team.

Balancing Strategy with Market Demands

Each licensing model offers unique advantages, and choosing the right one often depends on a company’s goals and resources.

Here’s a quick comparison of the key models:

Model Pros Cons
Licensing Simple, scalable, minimal involvement High financial risk for the licensee
Revenue-Sharing Shared risks and rewards, collaborative Requires strong trust and cooperation
Profit-Sharing Aligns closely with profitability goals Complex accounting, high transparency needed

Justin Brandt, founding partner of Arizona law firm Bianchi & Brandt, advocates for licensing as a straightforward route to entering new markets. He emphasized the importance of finding dependable partners to ensure success.

As cannabis operators explore these strategies, the industry continues to evolve with a mix of innovation and pragmatism, opening doors to new opportunities across the nation.

FacebookTwitterPinterestLinkedInTumblrRedditVKWhatsAppEmail

Lars Beckers

Lars Beckers is a distinguished senior content writer at MMJ Gazette, bringing a wealth of experience and expertise to the realm of medical marijuana and cannabis-related content. With a deep understanding of the industry and a passion for sharing knowledge, Lars's articles offer readers comprehensive insights and engaging narratives in the dynamic world of cannabis. Known for his meticulous research, clarity of expression, and commitment to delivering high-quality content, Lars brings a seasoned perspective to his work, educating and informing audiences on the latest trends and developments in the field.

Massachusetts Inches Closer to New Cannabis Chief as Arkansas Faces Leadership Change
Nearly 70 Michigan Marijuana Businesses Fined for Violations
Related posts
  • Related posts
  • More from author
Hemp

FBI Raids Virginia Sen. Lucas Hemp Business

May 8, 20260
Cannabis

280E Tax Relief: How Far Back for Cannabis?

May 6, 20260
News

Missouri Cannabis Cartel Sued Over License Grab

May 1, 20260
Load more
Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SEARCH
PROMOTIONS
RECENT POSTS
  • FBI Raids Virginia Sen. Lucas Hemp Business
  • 280E Tax Relief: How Far Back for Cannabis?
  • Missouri Cannabis Cartel Sued Over License Grab
  • Indiana’s $1.8B Illegal Weed Spend Sparks Legal Fight
  • Florida Hits Trulieve Over Cannabis Farm Pollution
  • Oklahoma Cannabis Farm Beats State License Ban
  • Trump Rescheduling Delivers Narrow Cannabis Tax Win
  • Marijuana Rescheduling Reshapes Cannabis Companies
  • Ari Raptis Masters Cannabis Logistics Boom
  • Predatory Investors Hijack Delaware Cannabis Equity Program
    © MMJ Gazette. 2024
    • About
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Authors